close
曾
Kate Walsh, Private Practice
Kate Walsh, Private Practice Question: Do you think there is any way Shonda Rhimes and the producers of Grey's Anatomy would consider making Addison a permanent fixture at Seattle Grace again? After all, Private Practice isn't called "Addison's Practice." The show could get on without her in my opinion, and I much prefer her on Grey's. How do you foresee Private Practice doing next year? Do you think the extended break will hurt its ratings? If so, Kate Walsh is guaranteed a spot back on Grey's, right? — Angela
Matt Roush: If Private Practice were to go under, I can't imagine why they wouldn't want Addison (Kate Walsh) back on Grey's, but I doubt they'll have to cross that bridge anytime soon. I'm not much of a fan of Private Practice (too silly to the point of asinine), but it was doing well enough, and the Grey's pedigree will inspire ABC to be very patient. But I liked her better on Grey's as well, and I am excited to see her returning as a special guest for this Thursday's episode. It's like Addison's IQ dropped in half (in inverse proportion to her libido) the minute she signed on at the Wellness Center. Private Practice is so smarmy it reminds me of Boston Legal with doctors, which is maybe what ABC was looking for. Anyway, the biggest question here is about all of the fall shows that got cut short by the strike but which will be relaunched in the fall: Practice, Pushing Daisies, Dirty Sexy Money, Chuck and Life. Will they be able to recover from the lost momentum of this punishingly long hiatus? In most cases (not so much this one), I hope so.
Question: With the loss of Jorja Fox earlier in the season and now with Gary Dourdan announcing his departure from the show, should CSI wrap up its series next year and go out on top? It looks like the show could lose all its major players at the end of next year, anyways, with William Petersen only signing a one-year contract and Marg Helgenberger and George Eads looking to follow suit. — Emily
Matt Roush: Not being up to speed on everyone's contract status and unable to predict the future a year from now, I'll only say that CSI is in a position where it will soon find out whether it truly is as durable as NBC's franchise hub Law & Order. In other words, is CSI itself the star of the show, and will it be able to thrive without its marquee players? William Petersen is the key to all of this. He is already reducing his participation in the show from season to season, but he's still there more often than not, and if he were to leave altogether, that would create an enormous challenge. Losing Jorja and now Gary are interesting test cases, but I'm confident the show can soldier on without them — providing the show begins making some significant new hires to tweak and grow the cast. Marg is also integral to the ensemble, and so, of course, is George, but it's hard to imagine CSI without Grissom above all. At some point, CSI will have to deal with this reality, and I'm sure CBS is committed to keeping the show around for as long as possible, even if (shades of ER) it eventually is being carried by an entirely new generation of stars.
*********************
*********************
Two and a Half Men and CSI: - Behind the Scenes Cross Over
PART1-
PART1-
PART-2
Two and a Half Men - "Stiffs" (CSI Parody)
這段超惡搞的....
這段超惡搞的....
Two and a Half Men and CSI: - Behind the Scenes Cross Over 3
全站熱搜
留言列表
關於影集的東東 (3)
